Collapse of an Empire | Yegor Gaidar

Summary of: Collapse of an Empire: Lessons for Modern Russia
By: Yegor Gaidar

Introduction

Delve into the world of the late Soviet Union as you explore the book summary of Collapse of an Empire: Lessons for Modern Russia by Yegor Gaidar. Get ready to learn about the challenges and consequences of the fall of empires, with a special focus on Russia’s experiences. Understand how empire collapses can lead to a rise of authoritarianism, violence, and instability, while also highlighting the importance of resource wealth management and its potential pitfalls. This summary will take you on a journey through Russia’s past while making important connections to its present and future.

Nostalgia for Empires

Empires that collapsed in the 20th century still have a lingering nostalgic effect. The collapse of empires in the 20th century can be classified into two types: those with clear divisions between cities and outlying territories, and those with integrated territories. The former allowed metropolitan populations to return home when an empire collapsed. The latter, however, integrated populations of metropolitan cities and their satellites, allowing for close and intimate interactions. These close relationships meant that when empires collapsed, metropolitan populations were suddenly faced with reduced power and prestige, potentially leading to discrimination. Russian and Austro-Hungarian empires were examples of the latter type and their collapse had particularly significant consequences on metropolitan populations. The aftermath of these events has led to nostalgia for empire, with Russia being a prime example. Its collapse has left many Russians feeling marginalized and discriminated against in new countries. This situation parallels that in German public opinion between the late 1920s and 1940. Russia, in particular, faces dangerous times again, evocative of the Hitler era, with Putin’s nationalist agenda.

Russia’s Transition and Yugoslavia’s Collapse

World War I saw the fall of all territorially integrated empires, except Russia. The USSR then emerged as the czarist empire under a different name and political structure. Czarist Russia harshly treated its subjects during the 19th century. However, sociopolitical changes in the 20th century led to new approaches that criticized the former ways as “crimes against humanity.” Despite Bolshevism restoring the czarist empire by substituting class struggle for ethnic rivalry, the problem of internal nationalities remained. Yugoslavia, a mini-empire of several ethnic groups, prospered during the Cold War by balancing ethnic interests until Tito died, and economic issues surfaced, leading to horrific bloodshed due to appeals to nostalgia for national glory.

The Fragility of Authoritarian Regimes

Authoritarian governments lack legitimacy and resort to violence to maintain power, but their lack of checks and balances leads to instability. Totalitarian regimes are even more fragile, often relying on mythologies. The collapse of an authoritarian regime may be caused by various factors, but it does not naturally lead to a stable successor.

Authoritarian regimes are built on a shaky foundation of force and violence. Machiavelli and Rousseau recognized the inherent instability of authoritarian regimes. Despite their efforts to squash dissent, public confidence erodes with the lack of checks and balances, leaving real power in the hands of a narrow elite. Notably, Mexico, Japan, and Italy exemplified this approach until they transitioned to democracy.

Totalitarian regimes are even more fragile, relying on quasi-religious mythologies like the 1,000-year Reich. However, even being illegitimate, authoritarian regimes may provide public order. Unfortunately, their collapse can cause political instability that can last for centuries without a stable successor.

Determining the cause of an authoritarian regime’s collapse is often difficult, even for the rulers themselves, as was the case for Mohammed Reza Pahlavi, the late Shah of Iran. The death of a pivotal leader, the globalization of information, ethnic rivalries or economic factors may exacerbate instability and lead to collapse. The emergence of a stable successor is not a given, making the transition from an authoritarian regime a delicate balance.

The Dangers of Resource Wealth

The consequences of relying on resource wealth are examined through historical examples, including Spain’s silver mines and the Soviet Union’s dependence on oil. The author argues that such wealth can lead to a lack of public discussion and economic self-reliance, along with vulnerabilities to volatile markets. The mismanagement of resource wealth in the Soviet Union contributed to its collapse, and cautionary tales like these highlight the importance of managing it prudently.

Want to read the full book summary?