Perilous Interventions | Hardeep Singh Puri

Summary of: Perilous Interventions: The Security Council and the Politics of Chaos
By: Hardeep Singh Puri


Explore the complex world of international diplomacy and geopolitical decision-making in ‘Perilous Interventions: The Security Council and the Politics of Chaos’ by Hardeep Singh Puri. Dive into the challenges and consequences of the United Nations Security Council’s interventions and the controversial Responsibility to Protect doctrine. The book scrutinizes specific examples, such as the 2003 invasion of Iraq, the Arab Spring, and the Libyan Crisis, to reveal how these interventions have often led to further chaos and bloodshed. The examination of each case provides insight into the failures, miscalculations, and unforeseen consequences of these actions, raising questions about the effectiveness of military force and foreign interventions as a means of maintaining global stability.

The Responsibility to Protect

The Responsibility to Protect (R2P) doctrine was adopted by the international community following the genocides in Rwanda and Srebrenica in the 1990s. R2P calls on nations to protect their citizens from mass atrocities and allows for foreign intervention in cases where the state is unable to do so. However, the implementation of R2P remains unclear, as evidenced by the United Nations Security Council’s uneven responses to various threats over the years. The UNSC has authorized interventions in the name of protecting civilians, but these actions often result in chaos and bloodshed, leading to the question of whether societies can be reordered from outside using military force.

Perilous Intervention

The book sheds light on the aftermath of the United Nations Security Council’s (UNSC) resolutions of force. The invasion of already-volatile nations leads to the loss of human lives, stunts human rights and pro-democracy efforts, and causes mass ecological and infrastructure damage. Policymakers’ miscalculations in decisions with far-reaching consequences often reverberate for years. The case of the 2003 invasion of Iraq intensified the region’s age-old Sunni-Shia conflict, unleashed anti-Western sentiment, and made extremist groups like ISIS more appealing. The West’s profound misunderstanding of the sociopolitical undercurrents within Iraq caused more harm than good. In conclusion, the UNSC’s perilous interventions highlight policymakers’ whimsical and reflexive decision-making, with dire consequences.

The Arab Spring: A Misunderstood Revolution

The Arab Spring protests began with hopes of bringing democracy to nations long under authoritarian rule. However, Western support was met with mistrust, and the movements eventually led to further repression. The West failed to understand the true goals of the protests and misread the situation, resulting in costly interventions and unintended consequences.

Misinterpreting Gaddafi

A critical look at the Western narrative of Gaddafi’s downfall and regime change in Libya.

Libya’s former leader, Muammar Gaddafi, was widely perceived as a brutal dictator who would stop at nothing to crush his opponents. However, a 2012 survey revealed that most Libyans preferred one-man rule due to the free healthcare and economic prosperity enjoyed under his leadership. Following Gaddafi’s attack on peaceful protesters, the United Nations Security Council approved military intervention at the urging of France and New Zealand. The United States was initially hesitant about military action, but quickly changed its mind after Secretary of State Hillary Clinton likened the situation to Rwanda.

Media reports in Western capitals inflamed the situation further, portraying Gaddafi as an unhinged madman using state weapons on overmatched freedom fighters. However, a careful analysis of his speeches indicates that Gaddafi did not plan a genocide of his own people. The Western powers chose to interpret his words as a warning of imminent bloodshed, and Libya descended into chaos. Private armies and militias sprang up after Gaddafi’s death, plunging the country into further violence. In hindsight, the decision to authorize military force and regime change in Libya was a mistake.

The Political Tension in Syria

The Syrian conflict led to the death of 470,000 people and forced over 10 million others to flee the country. Despite this, the UNSC chose not to intervene due to the complex situation, where Sunni majority was controlled by Shia and Christian minorities. The West armed anti-Assad rebels, and Russian forces bombed them, leading to political tension between the US and Russia. The West’s actions were justified due to Assad’s atrocities against civilians. However, Russia claimed that Assad was the lawful leader and that his removal would result in ISIS’s control of the region. The military intervention by Russia added a layer of uncertainty to the possibility of a political resolution.

Want to read the full book summary?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Fill out this field
Fill out this field
Please enter a valid email address.
You need to agree with the terms to proceed