The Myth of the Rational Voter | Bryan Caplan

Summary of: The Myth of the Rational Voter: Why Democracies Choose Bad Policies
By: Bryan Caplan

Introduction

In the book ‘The Myth of the Rational Voter: Why Democracies Choose Bad Policies’, Bryan Caplan explores the assumptions behind the functioning of democracy and sheds light on the reasons why democracies sometimes fail to deliver effective policies. Delving into the miracle of aggregation and its limitations, the book discusses the role of biases, such as the mistrust of the free market and foreign trade, in distorting voters’ opinions. Furthermore, Caplan highlights the importance of emotional attachment and personal interests in shaping voters’ choices. This summary will provide a comprehensive understanding of the key themes and arguments put forth by the author.

The Miracle of Aggregation and Democracy

Democracy is considered a great achievement in human history. It’s based on the “miracle of aggregation,” where the average answer given by a group tends to be correct. This phenomenon is applied to politics, where the average voter might not be well-informed, but divergent opinions of a large group of voters will nullify each other, leading to a moderate and informed result. In a perfect democracy, popular ideas prevail, and extreme viewpoints are canceled out. The miracle of aggregation is what makes democracy function better than dictatorships, where only certain elites hold opinions contrary to the majority. The East German government’s decision to build the Berlin Wall in 1961 stood in stark contrast to the general political sentiment of the East German people. If the country had been democratic, such a wall would never have been built. The book explores why sometimes democracies fail.

The Miracle of Aggregation

Governments fail to promote the common good due to widespread biases leading to contradicting policies. The miracle of aggregation, which works by varying opinions, has one fatal flaw: biased information. Biases are popular and widespread as demonstrated by the 1996 SAEE, where ordinary citizens’ economic opinions differ significantly from economists’. Biases prevent the miracle of aggregation from fulfilling its role, causing policy implementations to fall short of the common good.

The Power of Free Markets

In this segment of the book, the author discusses the common bias against the free market. Most people believe that any action driven by profit is harmful to society. However, this is a result of a false understanding of market principles. The money earned by selling a product or service is revenue, which is distinct from profits. Revenue is used to reinvest in cost-effective factories and employ more labor, which ultimately benefits society. The author argues that free market processes are of greater benefit to society than people tend to think. The antimarket bias is one of many pervasive biases that affect society.

Misconceptions of Foreign Trade

Many people harbor a bias against foreign trade, believing that only the exporting country benefits. However, trade and exchange benefit both parties involved. This bias stems from the misconception that when importing more goods than exporting, a country is losing money. In reality, successful trades benefit every participant in the market. Like dividing household chores, it is sensible to trade services as it ensures tasks are completed faster and benefits all parties. Despite this, statistics reveal a common distrust of foreign trade. The bias against trade deals also spills into the job market, with many assuming that trade agreements destroy American jobs. However, economists believe that such deals do not eliminate domestic jobs.

The Benefits of Job Reductions

While job reductions may invite public fury, they can benefit the economy as a whole. Though losing gainful employment poses significant challenges, it frees up the workforce to be utilized more efficiently in other industries. Technological advancements have made it possible for fewer individuals to accomplish tasks formerly requiring many hands. While this can be hard for individual farmers or families, it opens up employment opportunities in other sectors. The economy undergoes growth as a result of a flexible workforce. With the steady supply of employees freed up by the industrial revolution, the expanding technological sector wouldn’t have advanced so much without them. On a smaller scale, installing a dishwasher in your home frees up whoever used to do dishes by hand to engage in other activities. Though several significant biases have been discussed as threats to democracy, there are still more to consider.

Want to read the full book summary?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Fill out this field
Fill out this field
Please enter a valid email address.
You need to agree with the terms to proceed